Florida officer records are live — search the officer testifying against your client, free. Search free →
SKIP TO MAIN CONTENT

BenchRecon Data Study · Federal

The same federal system, a 21.8× gap in prison time.

Across 378,458 federal sentencing records (USSC, FY2020–FY2025), the national median prison sentence is 21 months, but the district median runs from 4 months in D. New Mexico to 87 months in S.D. Iowa. A 21.8× spread for the same federal code.

We analyzed every federal individual-offender record in the U.S. Sentencing Commission's public datafile for FY2020 through FY2025, 378,458 cases, and took the median total prison sentence in each of the 94 judicial districts. The result is a map of where a federal charge costs the most months in custody, before and after controlling for what the charge is.

Aggregate analysis. Reproducible from public USSC data. No individual is named.

21 monational median federal prison sentence (n=377,673)
87 moharshest district median, S.D. Iowa
4 molowest district median, D. New Mexico
21.8×spread, harshest vs. lowest district

Where a federal charge costs the most months

The twelve districts with the highest median total prison sentence, FY2020–FY2025(districts with at least 200 sentenced records). Every row carries its case count.

Highest district median prison sentence (FY2020–FY2025)
DistrictCircuitMediann
S.D. Iowa8th87 mo2,477
W.D. Arkansas8th74 mo1,196
E.D. Kentucky6th72 mo2,617
C.D. Illinois7th72 mo1,461
W.D. Missouri8th70 mo4,365
E.D. Tennessee6th70 mo3,645
S.D. Indiana7th70 mo2,558
S.D. Illinois7th70 mo1,436
D. Minnesota8th63 mo2,043
N.D. Texas5th60 mo8,724
E.D. Texas5th60 mo4,887
D. Nebraska8th60 mo2,764

And where it costs the fewest

The ten lowest district medians. The bottom of the list is dominated by the Southwest border districts, D. New Mexico, D. Arizona, S.D. Texas, W.D. Texas, whose dockets are heavy with high-volume, low-level immigration cases. That case mix, not a lenient bench, is what pulls these overall medians down; the offense-controlled tables below show what happens when the charge is held constant.

Lowest district median prison sentence (FY2020–FY2025)
DistrictCircuitMediann
N.D. New York2nd18 mo2,323
W.D. Washington9th18 mo2,023
D. Delaware3rd18 mo569
E.D. New York2nd14 mo3,568
S.D. California9th13 mo18,382
D. Vermont2nd12 mo926
W.D. Texas5th8 mo45,754
S.D. Texas5th8 mo43,939
D. Arizona9th6 mo26,228
D. New Mexico10th4 mo13,068

The complete ranking covers 93 districts (the 1 below the 200-record floor is omitted). Median = 50th percentile of total prison months; n = sentenced individual-offender records in that district.

The gap holds inside a single charge

A skeptic's first objection is case mix: maybe the harsh districts just see worse crimes. So we held the charge constant. Within each of the four highest-volume federal offense categories, the district median still swings widely. For drug trafficking, one of the two largest categories by count, and the largest by total prison time imposed, the median ranges from 12 months to 132 months across the 92 districts with 100+ such cases, against a national median of 60 months. Same charge, an order-of-magnitude difference in exposure depending on where it is filed.

Drug Trafficking

National median 60 mo (n=107,244). Among the 92 districts with 100+ drug trafficking cases, the district median ranges 12 mo to 132 mo.

Drug Trafficking, harshest districts
DistrictCircuitMediann
S.D. Iowa8th132 mo1,121
S.D. Indiana7th120 mo1,014
D. South Dakota8th120 mo891
N.D. Iowa8th120 mo678
C.D. Illinois7th120 mo563
W.D. Louisiana5th115 mo655
E.D. Texas5th114 mo2,284
D. Nebraska8th114 mo1,159
Drug Trafficking, lowest districts
DistrictCircuitMediann
D. New Hampshire1st36 mo551
S.D. California9th27 mo8,386
D. Arizona9th24 mo2,916
D. Vermont2nd22 mo454
E.D. New York2nd18 mo963
N.D. California9th12 mo970

Firearms

National median 37 mo (n=50,007). Among the 87 districts with 100+ firearms cases, the district median ranges 12 mo to 65 mo.

Firearms, harshest districts
DistrictCircuitMediann
D. Minnesota8th65 mo421
E.D. Louisiana5th63 mo329
D. South Carolina4th60 mo735
M.D. Georgia11th60 mo502
E.D. Kentucky6th60 mo280
W.D. Michigan6th57 mo342
N.D. Florida11th57 mo235
W.D. Arkansas8th57 mo174
Firearms, lowest districts
DistrictCircuitMediann
D. Oregon9th24 mo359
S.D. California9th24 mo295
W.D. Washington9th24 mo153
D. Vermont2nd15 mo163
D. Maine1st15 mo147
D. Arizona9th12 mo790

Fraud / Theft / Embezzlement

National median 9 mo (n=30,510). Among the 80 districts with 100+ fraud / theft / embezzlement cases, the district median ranges 0 mo to 24 mo.

Fraud / Theft / Embezzlement, harshest districts
DistrictCircuitMediann
S.D. Florida11th24 mo1,707
N.D. Texas5th24 mo794
E.D. California9th24 mo307
W.D. North Carolina4th24 mo261
S.D. Indiana7th24 mo186
N.D. Georgia11th21 mo536
E.D. Virginia4th18 mo793
E.D. Texas5th18 mo497
Fraud / Theft / Embezzlement, lowest districts
DistrictCircuitMediann
D. New Mexico10th0 mo149
E.D. Washington9th0 mo132
S.D. West Virginia4th0 mo125
D. New Hampshire1st0 mo123
W.D. Arkansas8th0 mo117
D. Maine1st0 mo109

Immigration

National median 4 mo (n=123,983). Among the 56 districts with 100+ immigration cases, the district median ranges 0 mo to 21 mo.

Immigration, harshest districts
DistrictCircuitMediann
N.D. Texas5th21 mo1,023
E.D. California9th21 mo103
E.D. Texas5th18 mo461
N.D. Illinois7th17 mo176
D. Colorado10th15 mo218
C.D. California9th12 mo450
W.D. Missouri8th12 mo101
W.D. Oklahoma10th9.5 mo412
Immigration, lowest districts
DistrictCircuitMediann
W.D. Louisiana5th0 mo140
W.D. Kentucky6th0 mo137
D. Oregon9th0 mo129
D. Wyoming10th0 mo119
S.D. Alabama11th0 mo112
E.D. Louisiana5th0 mo104

Only cells with at least 100 cases are shown, so each median rests on a stable sample. A median of 0 months (seen in some fraud and immigration cells) reflects districts where the typical such case resolves in probation or time served, itself a marker of how differently the same charge is treated.

Florida's three districts

Even inside one state, the median diverges. Florida's three federal districts span a 16-month range overall.

Florida federal districts, median prison sentence (FY2020–FY2025)
DistrictCircuitMediann
M.D. Florida11th46 mo7,034
N.D. Florida11th40 mo1,615
S.D. Florida11th30 mo8,215

Methodology & limitations

Source & method

  • Source: U.S. Sentencing Commission, Commission Datafiles, individual-offender records (public). ussc.gov/research/datafiles. Snapshot analyzed: 2026-06-26.
  • Population: 378,458 FY2020–FY2025 individual-offender records. Medians use the 377,673 records with a numeric total prison term (USSC variable TOTPRISN); probation-only and life/death-coded terms are excluded from the median.
  • Statistic: the median (50th percentile, computed with percentile_cont) of total prison months, grouped by judicial district (USSC variable DISTRICT). The geographic table shows districts with 200+ records; the offense tables show district cells with 100+ records.
  • Offense control: the offense-controlled cuts restrict to a single USSC offense-guideline category (OFFGUIDE): Drug Trafficking, Firearms, Fraud/Theft/Embezzlement, and Immigration, the four highest-volume categories. Labels are taken verbatim from the USSC variable codebook.
  • Reproducible: a published analysis script regenerates every figure on this page from the source data, and a companion verification script re-checks each number against the live datafile.

What the data does NOT show

  • A district's median reflects its case mix as much as its bench. A low overall median (the border districts) is driven by a high volume of low-level immigration cases, not by lenient judges. The offense-controlled cuts isolate more, but not all, of the charging-culture and judicial component.
  • Medians describe the typical case, not any individual sentence, and not the appropriate sentence in any matter. Mandatory minimums, criminal history, and acceptance of responsibility all move individual cases off the median.
  • This is the federal guidelines population only, not state-court sentencing, and not pre-guidelines or fast-track program detail beyond what the datafile encodes.
  • Do not infer anything about a specific judge, defendant, or case from these aggregate district figures. This study identifies no individual.

Cite this analysis

Journalists and researchers, please link to this page as the source.

BenchRecon, “Federal sentencing disparity by district: a 22× spread in median prison time” (USSC FY2020–FY2025individual-offender data). https://benchrecon.com/data/federal-sentencing-disparity

The underlying figures come from the public USSC datafile and are reproducible from the published analysis script.

Download the data: CSV · JSON

Build the comparable for your district

BenchRecon's Sentencing Snapshot turns this district-level signal into a case-specific comparables brief, the median and distribution for your charge, criminal-history category, and district, cited to the underlying USSC records, ready to file as a §3553(a) exhibit.

Common questions

What does this study measure?
The median total prison sentence, in months, for federal individual-offender cases by judicial district, FY2020–FY2025 (USSC data, n=378,458). The national median is 21 months; the district median ranges from 4 to 87 months, a 21.8× spread across districts.
Does a higher district median mean that district's judges are harsher?
Not by itself. A district's overall median reflects its case mix as much as its bench. Border districts post low medians largely because they process a high volume of low-level immigration cases, not because their judges are lenient on serious crime. To separate that out, the study also reports medians within a single charge type, and the geographic gap persists there too, which isolates more of the local charging-culture and judicial component.
Does the disparity hold within the same charge?
Yes. For drug-trafficking cases, one of the two largest federal offense categories by count (n=107,244), and the largest by total prison time imposed, the district median ranges from 12 to 132 months across the 92 districts with at least 100 such cases, against a national median of 60 months. Firearms, fraud, and immigration cases show the same pattern.
Why use the median instead of the average?
Sentence length is heavily right-skewed, a handful of very long terms pulls the mean upward and misstates the typical case. The median (50th percentile) is the standard, robust summary of the typical sentence and is what the Sentencing Commission itself reports.
Is this every federal case?
It is the USSC individual-offender datafile for FY2020–FY2025, restricted to records with a numeric prison term (probation-only and life/death-coded terms are excluded from the median). It covers original sentences under the guidelines; it is not a census of every disposition. Each cell shown carries its own record count (n).
Can I cite or reuse this?
Yes, please link to this page as the source. The underlying data is the public USSC datafile, and every figure is reproducible by re-running the published analysis script against it.